Sign Guestbook Back to The Complete Idiot's Guide to String Theory
| Date | 2014-04-01 |
| Location |  |
| Message | Hi. I'm fascinated by Quantum entanglement, and I came across the article you placed on Scientific American. I'm not a scientist, but I want to conduct my own quantum entanglement experiments. There are quite a few questions I'd like to answer with it. The only thing that bothers me is the radioactive material the home made set you described is. Is it completely necessary? I don't really want my home to be a hot spot. Thanks. Robert Feld.  |
Private Message added 2014-03-23 |
Private Message added 2014-03-04 |
| Date | 2014-02-18 |
| Location |  |
| Message | Hi Mr. Musser, My name is Elijah Wolfson. I’m a senior editor over at Newsweek, responsible primarily for our health, science, and technology sections. I’m currently reaching out to writers in the space whose work I’ve read and admired over the past couple of years. I wanted to see if you are currently seeking any freelance writing opportunities. If you have any interest, let me know, and we can set up a time to talk in more depth. Best, Elijah |
| Date | 2014-02-02 |
| Location |  |
| Message | Hi. Just read your article on retrocausality and was impressed with your clarity of presentation. I'd like to call your attention to my four-book epic series 'The Caves of Etretat', with the first three books available for free, on Smashwords.com, in which I explore and develop the concept of retrocausality as the cause of our existence. While I wrote the series, answers presented themselves inevitably about retrocausality. I've yet to have a physicist read the series to review the theories I present (which are really an amalgam of existing theories, drawn to their logical conclusion). If you would be so inclined, please check out the series. The fourth book holds the most important revelations but the series consistently gets 5-stars from regular readers, so you won't be bored if you take it on. Enjoy, and let me know what you think. Again, congrats on your article. |
| Date | 2014-01-31 |
| Message | Dear Mr. Musser, Perhaps you may wish to see https://sites.google.com/site/maximalsettheory/home/natural-healing https://sites.google.com/site/maximalsettheory Regards, Dimi Chakalov |
| Date | 2014-01-07 |
| Location | |
| Message | I'm trying to be a science author/promoter, like you. I've made a few polished short films that have been endorsed by Prf. Mike Archer, who I saw at TEDx in D.C. last March. Video of his (and your) speaking engagements is valuable. What I'm trying to do, though, is combine voice with compelling visuals - and set to music. My work is here: www.williamshane.org I hope to share my work with others in the field and hopefully continue my life in this direction. |
| Date | 2013-12-22 |
| Location | |
| Message | Dear Profeesor Musser: The French published the COMMETA report. Likley UFO'S can travel faster than the speed of light as evidenced by their ability to avoid inertial mass and GRAVITY. Regarding DARK MATTER AND ENERGY, We can't see them so why should we believe they exit. Suppose galaxies stay together because supermassive black holes alter an ether of space so that at the near edge of the galaxy's the ether motion cannot support explosive motion , maybe it's a quantum effect. write back GERARD SCALLY, ibcec.org |
Private Message added 2013-12-15 |
| Date | 2013-11-07 |
| Location | |
| Message | Dear Dr. Musser, I recently read your post on the 100 TeV pp collider versus the Japan ILC. We have written a recent paper which shows that the fine-tuning arguments about SUSY are greatly over-estimated. They key feature for obtaining natural supersymmetry is a set of rather light higgsinos around 100-200 GeV. The other sparticles can be quite heavier. The higgsinos are nearly impossible to see at LHC but easily seen at ILC. See arXiv:1309.2984 for more details. Best, Howie Baer |
Page 8 of 23 << First < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > Last >>