| Date | 2010-09-05 12:17 |
| Message | i work 6pm-6am weds 29th thru sat 2nd... can we do sunday the 3rd afternoon or evening? avail any 4 days on either side of that 29-2nd range.. |
| Date | 2010-09-04 05:37 |
| Message | That is Friday, Oct. 1 |
| Date | 2010-09-04 05:34 |
| Message | My suggestion would be Friday, Oct. 7:30 pm at my house. I have a feeling Wiebe will be the hardest to co-ordinate a meeting time with. Duke can use his money from his prize winnings and fly out for the night. |
| Date | 2010-09-04 04:01 |
| Message | Yeah, we should set a draft date pretty quick here so we can try to work around as many peoples schedules as possible. I'm available any night except Mon and Wed. |
| Date | 2010-09-03 08:55 |
| Message | Kovalchuk.... phew |
| Date | 2010-09-03 04:44 |
| Message | When is the draft? |
| Date | 2010-08-31 01:31 |
| Message | I'd be willing to increase entry fee to $30, with prize money going to the top 3 finishers. I also think the payment situation is the least of our problems. If you don't live in the same town as Rob Brown, write a check, and put it in the mail. If the postage is dated later than say October 1 you loose your first mid season pick. The monthly roster move debate is a bit more unclear for me. I know from my own perspective I will continue to go out of my way to get my roster in on time, but in circumstances where someone is out of town or out of range to get his roster in, a definite punishment needs to be put in place. It would seem to be fairly easy to police this situation if rosters continue to be posted on the banter board, which states the date of the post. If you post past the first day of the month you should be issued a pre determined penalty. What the appropriate penalty is is the question. |
| Date | 2010-08-30 05:11 |
| Message | i'm cool with whatever for the money.. i don't think we should increase by more than ten bucks... paying up front makes too much sense. out of towners just mail rob a cheque and he sends the winner a cheque at the end of the year... email transfers take two seconds and work well too... i have no interest in voting on roster move disputes.. it got silly last year... we should make up rules we can live with or just say anything goes.. it's way too grey right now.. |
| Date | 2010-08-29 05:14 |
| Message | As per the issue over tanking - I believe Dan's proposal would be quite effective and relatively painless. I would be in favor of such a rule, there by helping to keep everyone honest (even if the don't mean to neglect their team). Money rule - I would be in favor of increasing the fee by $10 and dividing that proportionately to 1st, 2nd and 3rd. Also agree with C-Dogg - money up front. But how do you do it with guys out of the province? |
| Date | 2010-08-29 04:29 |
| Message | I still maintain that I don't think that there is a problem with motivation in this league. If I look at all 8 GM's there are definitely varying levels of interest (or time spent on pool) at varying times during the year but that isn't something (IMHO) that can really change either. We all have lives and sometimes more important things get in the way. Or let me word it this way... I think now that the Bruins have new ownership we don't have any problems in that regards. In this pool (for last season) I would probably be accused as having the least amount of 'interest' (asides from the Bruins) and if that is the case then I think we have a healthy league because I am very interested right now. In regards to missing month end moves again I don't think we need to pull the trigger on any big changes here (maybe small changes). I was obviously the cause of this one again last year but of the vacation and Bieksa injury and the drama that followed. I think the action we took was good: a league vote and proper substitution made. I do think we need to make of few of these discussion points from this year into real rules as well. And we need to say that the entry fee is payable up front |