MERSTHAM FC
After several abusive entries messages will appear
here only after approval by MFC
Please do not hide behind pseudonyms
True Fans are not ashamed of using their real names
Sign Guestbook Back to Merstham FC
| Date | 09-11-13 |
| Location |  |
| Message | Yes, Phil Watling – he gives me his Surrey Mirror once he`s read it.. I chuckle as I read the sports section (re-using a tea bag for the 4th time) that the Bird (a la Mr McGroin) always says that teams “raise their game” coming to Merstham – he`s the manager and should have the team suitably motivated and this excuse is getting weak - just like my tea. Agree with Tony Ritchie – haven’t seen a second half goal this year ! (scored by Merstham) So you are paying at least for that priviledge.. Was at Leatherhead today (free after 30 mins folks..) and we played better in parts - but still lost.. Now where’s the next away fixture ?? |
| Date | 08-11-13 |
| Message | With you there, Fishy. Laughed out loud when I first read it: had it down as a delicious morsel of irony. |
| Date | 08-11-13 |
| Location |  |
| Message | I am leaving Merstham FC We used to be a family club If you look at our fans photo page we have a so called semi professional paid football player bearing his backside for all and sundry Bye Merstham |
| Date | 07-11-13 |
| Message |  Actually didn't take Dermott's post seriously and thought it was a bit of a humorous dig at those who do wait until half time to watch a game (admittedly myself included for reasons other than saving a few quid). Of course I could be wrong and he could be another tight so-and-so?! |
| Date | 07-11-13 |
| Location | |
| Message | Mr Jones, we have decided that it is unfair on spectators that have paid the full admission price that anyone should see half the game for nothing. On cup games with extra time that would mean 75 minutes for nothing and maybe more if there were penalties. We have to cover our expenses and the officials and floodlights alone cost nearly £200 per game. Where do you suggest we get this from? I will let Phil Watling,Secretary of Redhill FC, know that you are coming. I sure he will be delighted. Richard Baxter Hon Sec |
| Date | 06-11-13 |
| Location | |
| Message | Call yourself a fan Dermott - The Club needs finacial support like any other in the area but you seem to want to pay nothing to watch - I know the football is dire under the Bird man and Home form Atrocious but don't begrudge the club £8 - they may need it to pay off Bird and bring in someone decent for a change............ |
| Date | 06-11-13 |
| Location | |
| Message | So Mr.Jones says that he has been comimg in at half time for many years free of charge while other supporters have been coming at the start of the game and paying for the privelage for many years. I fail to see why those people who only want to come to watch the second half of game should think that they should get in for nothing. |
| Date | 03-11-13 |
| Location | |
| Message | How come the gates remain locked after half time. I`ve been supporting Merstham FC for half a game for 20 years !! Who`s idea is this? Unbelievable.. I will now become a half time supporter of Redhill !! |
| Date | 17-10-13 |
| Message | Mr Collis. Whilst I understand that your appeal against the use of the term "for Christ's sake" was delivered in the politest way possible, I feel that there is no place for Christian fundamentalism on here. I fail to see what is remotely blasphemous about the phrase. To blaspheme is to take a god’s name in vain. What the author actually wrote was a form of: “For the sake of Christ.” How is that an insult to your religion? How is that being in any way, shape or form disrespectful? If anything, it is quite the opposite for he is using Christ as the yardstick by which good should be measured. The author has even used a capital C in “Christ”. Where, then, is there any evidence of disrespect? I am, and have been my entire working life, a professional writer: words are my currency. And it so happens that at the moment I am reading a near first edition of Charles Dickens’ David Copperfield. In it the term “for Christ’s sake” is used. When this book was published in 1850 and subsequently became immensely popular through numerous reprints in the mid-Victorian era, British society was governed by High Church Christian doctrine to a far greater degree than today. Yet neither Dickens nor his publishers were asked to withdraw the book for outraging Christian ideals. So, please, Mr Collis, I respectfully ask that confine your comments on here to football and save us from your somewhat narrow-minded and misguided form of religious fundamentalism. Jim Murray |
| Date | 14-10-13 |
| Location | |
| Message | I am not going to comment on the content of the last two messages other than respectfully to ask that blasphemy please not be written or published, as it is offensive and unnecessary. I don't believe the intention was to offend in this way at all, so please be aware that to me, as a Christian, it does. Thank you. |
Page 9 of 84 << First < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > Last >>