Reply to Mary:

Thanks for your message. I am sure you saw depressions that you believed to be human footprints. However, a number of specious phenomena that can create human like shapes. Many of the depressions once claimed to be human in the park were erosional markings, which are no longer supported even by the major creationist groups. As my articles explain, most other alleged "man tracks," especially at sites outside the park, are forms of metatarsal dinosaur tracks. Still others were carvings on loose rocks.
Let's look at this from another standpoint. Thousands of people visit the park every year. If real human tracks occurred there, surely many other people would have seen and photographed them, and they would be well documented (and still supported) by the major creationist organizations.
Moreover, if you saw clear human tracks in the same rocks with dinosaur tracks, would you yourself not have photographed such a stupendous find? If so, can you show us your photos (perhaps post them to a URL, or email them to me) so that the markings in question can be more fully evaluated? Memories and anecdotal accounts are notoriously fallible, even when entirely sincere. Science needs hard evidence. Thank you.
Glen K