| Date | 2015-09-14 12:12 |
| Message | Alright - just waiting for Terror and Jono input. Let's get this done boys. Duke - can you contact Jono, I'll get ahold of Terror. |
| Date | 2015-09-12 11:05 |
| Message | Yes to C Yes to Oct 3 |
| Date | 2015-09-12 02:01 |
| Message | Yes to C Yes to Oct 3 |
| Date | 2015-09-11 12:27 |
| Message | yes to "c" yes to oct 3rd yes to beating the tar out of rob |
| Date | 2015-09-11 07:34 |
| Message | yes for C yes for Oct 3 |
| Date | 2015-09-10 05:58 |
| Message | Draft date: what are your suggestions? Friday Oct. 2 is out for me, but what about Sat. Oct. 3? I know for some, Sunday isn't great. |
| Date | 2015-09-10 05:56 |
| Message | I have been chewing on option 'c' for quite some time now - I do think it would be best. (I did try Jeff's suggestion (i.e. creating a smaller 2nd round waiver protection list than 5, followed by a 3rd waiver protection list) and in my opinion would not really help this waiver/re-draft proposal, plus it would only serve to complicate the draft even further.) I would like us to move to a vote on proposal 'c' - vote yes for 'c' and 'no' against. |
| Date | 2015-09-02 09:33 |
| Message | Re: Buffy - yup - d man. We go with what the HN says at beginning of season. |
| Date | 2015-09-02 07:41 |
| Message | What is the roster position for FHL of Byfuglien? He is listed as a forward on Jono's team, but considered a defenseman in the Hockey News, which has traditionally been our position guide. |
| Date | 2015-09-02 05:28 |
| Message | I'm just enjoying the banter here. I'm most on board with option C, and most likely in favour of something more aggressive that promotes more competition each year. So that might mean having the same thought as Cam about the number of players protected being reduced. |