| Date | 2012-04-05 11:13 |
| Message | I feel sick. |
| Date | 2012-04-04 03:20 |
| Message | I have wanted a rule like this for a long time but for whatever reason, it was never solidified. You guys are right that it needs to be black and white. I don't mind making the changes but its not right (for me or others) to be in a position where there is a conflict of interest. So next year we will make the deadline officially at 12 midnite on the last day of the month. As well, I will send out an email to all GM's the day before as a reminder. |
| Date | 2012-04-04 12:43 |
| Message | I agree, if the rule is just kept as black and white there's no reason for anyone to look like a jerk or peoples feelings to get hurt... Set a deadline, if moves aren't in they don't go in, we already have the anti-tanking rule in by point count anyways? |
| Date | 2012-04-04 08:07 |
| Message | Sorry guys, I've been swamped with election stuff...though, if I was winning the pool, I definitely would've remembered to make my changes. My bad. |
| Date | 2012-04-02 07:17 |
| Message | there's no way my move goes in, players involved were on the ice and it broke your rule from last month. i think the rule should be more black and white, like a noon PST cutoff on the first. or whenever, but just a set time. the april deadline is always a bit of a tough one to remember. |
| Date | 2012-04-02 04:26 |
| Message | Next year I will unvolunteer to make the changes at month end. I just don't like the spot it puts me in from people refusing to honor the deadline. Case in point, I made the changes at 11:30am PST on Sunday. Do I break my rule after one month or risk looking like a jerk if Dan loses by 1 point? |
| Date | 2012-04-01 02:12 |
| Message | Looks like the rest of us are tanking |
| Date | 2012-04-01 12:20 |
| Message | missed the deadline. datsyuk for daniel if allowed. posted at 2:23 MST with 13:32 left in the first period of detroit's game.... |
| Date | 2012-03-31 08:54 |
| Message | Enstrom in for Myers, Lidstrom in for Yandle, Price in for Kipper. |
| Date | 2012-03-23 11:17 |
| Message | Yup - it's a close one. Too bad the Duke's had some inner-squad fighting, taking each other out. Duke's gonna have a hard time winning without those two. |