Welcome To PChuck's GuestBook!
Please leave me a message, if you like. Note the verification code box, at the bottom of the message window, just under the row of Smilies. Type the verification code into the box to its right, before hitting Post Message.
If you have a technical question, please ask it in Nitecruzr Dot Net - Blogging, where we can interact easier.
If you have a technical question, please ask it in Nitecruzr Dot Net - Blogging, where we can interact easier.
NOTE: If you choose to leave your email address here (as most folks do), please relax - it won't be visible to anybody but me. And I hate spammers more than you do.
ALSO NOTE: If you're looking for help, your best chance is in an online forum. You can find instructions in my Introduction Webpage. Asking for help, and providing help, is not easily done here. Please use an online forum for help requests - support the community!
ALSO NOTE: If you're looking for help, your best chance is in an online forum. You can find instructions in my Introduction Webpage. Asking for help, and providing help, is not easily done here. Please use an online forum for help requests - support the community!
Sign Guestbook Back to Nitecruzr Dot Net Report abuse
Private Message added 2007-11-17 3:29 |
| Date | 2007-11-15 21:30 |
| Location |  |
| Message | I found the misleading errors: "shome is not accessible. You might not have permission to use this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to find out if you have access permissions. This list of servers for this workgroup is not currently available" and "\P9333iii is not accessable. You might not have permission to use this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to find out if you have access permissions. The network path was not found." were caused by Norton Internet Security 2007 Personal Firewall. My work around was to select Personal Firewall, Configure, Trust Control, Trusted and add each computer's IP address that I wanted to access. Therefore I only needed the article's basic diagnostics first step. I followed basic diagnostic step 4 and checked Enable NetBios over Tcpip to enable the computer icon to show under My Network Places... Thanks for posting the help. PS I don't have Goggle email. |
| Date | 2007-11-15 17:38 |
| Location | |
| Message | Computer "CAD" nerd |
Private Message added 2007-11-15 3:08 |
Private Message added 2007-11-04 12:05 |
| Date | 2007-11-03 16:37 |
| Location |  |
| Message | Have been struggling all day with printing from vista to printer on xp box and getting access denied message. On MS forums found a reply made by yourself on same issue. The solution around creating a local port on the Vista pc worked just fine....can get some sleep right now. Thanks very much. |
| Date | 2007-10-27 11:09 |
| Location | |
| Home Page | www.holzerent.com |
| Message | I read your advice re Vista vs Win98 networking. Two comments; Yes, technology advances, and it is not reasonable for Microsoft to have to maintain a ten year old operating system in perpetuity. But every "new" op system is so bulky that it is not possible to upgrade NOTEBOOKS. Unlike large boxes, they have severe limitations. But my Thinkpad 240X's work fabulously, except for the needless "fixes" to stuff which ain't broke, while the stuff which is continues to be repaired by forcing US to have to tell it that "it's OK" to do every stupid little thing. I can still buy parts for a Model T, to say nothing of my Porsches. See comments above. Forcing me to have to go find out how to let my Win98 machines not crash every time they look at my ONLY Vista (which I would have refused had I know it was not the only choice, by the way!) while the Vista machine sees the Win98 OK, instead of telling me about the differences up front is an insult to their customer base. The EU was right to hammer them hard. That the USJD didn't is a shame, because this is arrogant. And, by the way, the Vista will not properly indicate when it actually connects to network resources if it has been Hibernated (excuse me - they HAD to call it another name; Sleep, JUST to confuse us!) I have spent way too much time re-learning what I already knew since Win 3.1 to use this turkey. Now I will have to toss a hand grenade into Regedit and HOPE it works?! |
| Date | 2007-10-26 15:55 |
| Location | |
| Message | Nice web site PChuck. I have not had much of a chance to check it all out but what I see so far, I like. Just a ritorical question. Why is it so difficult to get XP Home to network compaired to XP Pro.? |
Private Message added 2007-10-26 1:41 |
| Date | 2007-10-23 20:15 |
| Location | |
| Message | Wonderful documentation. I now am pretty clear how the browser stuff works, but what happens in a workgroup only environment when you throw a wins server into the mix? Does it make the browsers all irrelevant? |
Page 51 of 98 << First < 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 > Last >>