| Message | G'day to all my new readers from the U.S. It is nice to have you all visit, I am glad you are enjoying my blog and you are all most welcome.
To try and answer some questions I have been asked by some of you.
Tom Dougherty, Try Watts Up With That - 450 peer reviewed papers sceptical of AGW.
The first are by Craig Loehle where he writes about reconstructing temperatures for the last 2000 years from Non Tree Ring proxies including Ice Cores and Lake Sediment Beds. At www.freesundayschoollessons.org/pdfs/climate-history. At the back of this paper Professor Loehle lists a range of cited literature. If you are interested in any of those papers I suggest you cut and paste the title into either Google or Bing and see what comes back from the search. I do know some papers you will have to pay to see.
It is my understanding that one fundamental flaw of the Ice Core data that was presented by Al Gore in his film and by others, was that the ice cores proved a lagging of CO2 rise compared to temperature (by up to 800 years)not a lead as is proposed now. I hope this helps.
Jim Merritt, thank you for your detailed message. I'm guessing that the LLL to which you referred was probably James Hansen given his relationship to Al Gore and propensity for exaggerating his data. Sadly we have similar people in Australia too, a couple of which I have highlighted inside. You might find this of interest too: www.spectator.co.uk/essays/all/5592803/the-cias-global-cooling-files.
Please visit again. |