| Date | 2011-03-09 |
| Message | pat gets to nominate first this year since donny retired.. what are we thinking? boston pizza again before the auction? unfortunately no park league for me this year.. 5pm dinner and 6:30 auction? |
| Date | 2011-03-08 |
| Message | Sorry for my absenteeism the past few weeks boys. I have nothing of note to offer for tuffies alum HOF. Speaks to my history as an all or nothing GM I guess! |
| Date | 2011-03-07 |
| Message | thx for everyone's input... after all's said and done, we're going with sportsline.. still actively seeking a couple more GM's as well.. tim you know anyone? |
| Date | 2011-03-03 |
| Message | Breaking down the stats.....Curt Schilling on Harold's team four times.....and four rings earned...ridiculous...do we even need to vote on that one?! And no Noel, i'm tonguing Harold's balls here......... |
| Date | 2011-03-03 |
| Message | If it gets rid of any stat headaches then yes im for paying a little more.... |
| Date | 2011-03-03 |
| Message | I too am okay with spening a little more money, With all due repect, I hate Curt Schiling! |
| Date | 2011-03-01 |
| Message | The H-Bombers nominate Curt Schilling for the HOF. I don't have an issue with spending a bit more for better stat service. |
| Date | 2011-02-23 |
| Message | harold suggested we look for a different stat service.. rotowire charges $89 and can handle both these issues. commish can override position eligibility and the system tracks roster moves. anyone have an issue with an extra $13 a season to make life easier and not have to change our rules to accomodate yahoo? |
| Date | 2011-02-22 |
| Message | i'll second that pat.. however, that rule's got me thinking. my goal for the pool is GM entered moves with zero adjustments. in order to avoid a youk adjustment if rostered as a 3B with no other active 3 baggers drafted, we'd have to list all teams as 2 x UT positions with no 3B. last year we had the problem with tejada until he got yahoo eligibility at 3B. with GM's entering their own moves, it's easiest to let the system police moves for position eligibility. that means we want to list actual positions in yahoo, not 10xUT to avoid adjustments. i think our rule is innovative, it just doesn't jive with yahoo. is it worth living with the adjustments to have our rule and roster spots on yahoo or should nuke the rule or list UT postions across the league for all positions where any player is granted eligibility by ULB? also, yahoo doesnt track roster moves from what i can tell. do we go with unlimited daily moves and add an IP cap and GP per position cap? (you can see how with unlimited moves i'd like to maintain positions instead of many UT spots) |
| Date | 2011-02-21 |
| Message | I'll nominate Kevin Youkilis for 3B eligibility on top of 1B, anyone second that.... |