| Date | 2008-01-28 |
| Message | March 28 that is |
| Date | 2008-01-28 |
| Message | Its probably time to start thinking about a date and place for the auction. Sat. march probably makes the most sense, does this work for everybody? |
| Date | 2008-01-25 |
| Message | sizemore kind of looks like pat.. no? http sports.yahoo.com/mlb/players/7256 |
| Date | 2008-01-24 |
| Message | 38 bucks for Lincecum....that price seemed to work out for Sizemore....oh wait, no it didn't. You can have him!!! Or not..... |
| Date | 2008-01-24 |
| Message | Just bought a magazine today and the tuffies are fired up and ready to avenge their dissapointing failed 2007 campaign and look to become the first five time champion. Hanley Ramirez will be anchoring the offense this year, but the other contract spot is said to be a tough battle between Cole Hamels, Prince Fielder, and Chris Young. Any of these three guys is available for the right price. Get ready to open your wallet for lincecum pat, he will be this years guy that we both go to the wall for. |
| Date | 2008-01-22 |
| Message | midseason picks aren't eligible for signing.. you're grasping at straws constable kelly! |
| Date | 2008-01-22 |
| Message | A question for clarification...are midseason pickups signable and would they then cost 7 bucks the first year or am I way off??? |
| Date | 2008-01-21 |
| Message | Anyone with guys they wanna sell I am interested in seeing who's available. Email me back at pkelly@abbypd.ca |
| Date | 2008-01-13 |
| Message | I thought that was how we were deciding Draft Day Guru, how were you voting previously Don? Who looked the best? Who had the nicest shoes? Oh and for the record I'm taking offers on Peavy's option. |
| Date | 2008-01-08 |
| Message | you're on fire hiebert! a mini article? wow. i will agree with you on the point that the old way of doing draft day guru was also dumb. what i would suggest is that IF we are going to award this (and we don't really have to b/c ultimately the champion is basically the guru).. but if we want that award i would say it has to be evaluated based on "bang for bucks" and great "bargains" and deals on draft day. we look back at the draft and say, "who made the most savvy picks with the fewest overpayments?" that to me has to be the criteria for such an award. this wouldn't necessarily be the champion b/c we know there is a lot of luck involved so you could draft five solid guys who dissapoint or get injured but have 15 amazing picks that vaulted you to second place. if that be the case the gm should be crowned as DD guru. that my two cents. i say either do it that way or get rid of the award. |