| tanggal | 06-08-05 |
| pesan | For much of the last decade, advocates of closer ties between the Indonesian military and the U.S. military have contended that a warmer U.S. embrace entailing training programs and education courses for TNI officers could expose them to democratic ideals and afford a professional military perspective. This argument ignores the decades of close U.S. - Indonesian military ties extending from the 1960's to the early 1990's when U.S. training was provided to over 8,000 Indonesian military officers. This 30-year period also encompasses the period when the Indonesian military committed some of its gravest atrocities and when a culture of impunity became ingrained. |
| tanggal | 06-08-05 |
| pesan | Absent tangible evidence of Indonesian military action to curb abuses, to allow itself to be held accountable, to end corruption, to submit itself to civilian rule and to end its sponsorship of terrorist militias, the Indonesian military should be seen for what it is: a rogue institution that directly threatens democracy in Indonesia. Existing restrictions on military-to-military ties between the United States and Indonesia must remain in place, conditionality should be strengthened and the IMET ban reinstated in FY 2006. Finally, a word about the future. The Indonesian people, Indonesian non-governmental organizations, the Indonesian media and individual Indonesians have demonstrated great courage in standing up to the intimidation of entrenched corrupt interests in their society and most especially its security forces to demand their right to live in a democratic society. The brave students who rallied in the streets in 1998 wrought a revolution, though since that historic victory, entrenched undemocratic elements have sought to undo reforms. Sadly, in some parts of Indonesia the 1998 reforms have had little meaning. The military, often employing terrorist militias, have most brutally repressed the popular struggle for reform in Aceh, West Papua and the Maluku Islands. It is vital that the central government engage civil society in these areas in peaceful dialogue and, in order to make such a dialogue viable, demilitarize those areas. |
| tanggal | 05-08-05 |
| pesan | Kalau Pepera di tidak direkayasa, Kalau Pepera di tidak cacat, Kalau tidak terjadi pelanggarah HAM di Papua, Kalau Otusus dilaksanakan dengan Sepenuh hati dan tidak ada masalah Kenapa pemerintah RI harus khawatir? Kenapa harus sibuk-sibuk lobi? Kenapa harus panik? Bukankah Pemerintah RI menunjukan kebodohan sendiri, dengan merespon secara berlebihan. Setidaknya 'melapor diri atau secara tidak langsung memberi pengakuan' bahwa BENAR, ada KEJAHATAN DAN KEMUNAFIKAN dan ITIKAT TIDAK BAIK terhadap Bangsa dan orang Papua. I.S.Kijne bilang: Tersembunyi Ujung Jalan, Hampir atau masih Jauh Ku dibimbing Tangan Tuhan, Ke Negeri yang tak ku Tahu, ------- Hai tanah ku Papua, kau Tanah Lahir ku Ku Kasih akan dikau, sehingga Ajalku. |