Welcome to the SCEPCOP Guestbook!
Please sign below to leave your feedback. Thanks.
Back to SCEPCOP Home Page
Please sign below to leave your feedback. Thanks.
Back to SCEPCOP Home Page
Sign Guestbook Back to SCEPCOP
| Date | 2009-11-08 |
| Location |  |
| Message | skep⋅tic [skep-tik] –noun 1. a person who questions the validity or authenticity of something purporting to be factual. 2. a person who maintains a doubting attitude, as toward values, plans, statements, or the character of others. 3. a person who doubts the truth of a religion, esp. Christianity, or of important elements of it. 4. (initial capital letter) Philosophy. a. a member of a philosophical school of ancient Greece, the earliest group of which consisted of Pyrrho and his followers, who maintained that real knowledge of things is impossible. b. any later thinker who doubts or questions the possibility of real knowledge of any kind. cyn⋅ic [sin-ik] –noun 1. a person who believes that only selfishness motivates human actions and who disbelieves in or minimizes selfless acts or disinterested points of view. 2. (initial capital letter) one of a sect of Greek philosophers, 4th century b.c., who advocated the doctrines that virtue is the only good, that the essence of virtue is self-control, and that surrender to any external influence is beneath human dignity. 3. a person who shows or expresses a bitterly or sneeringly cynical attitude. Most skeptics like Randi et al are actually cynics. Which one are you? |
| Date | 2009-11-05 |
| Message | Love your site. Especially in the forums when you shut up those Rationalwiki idiots. Those guys are pathetic losers! Long live SCEPCOP!!! |
| Date | 2009-08-28 |
| Location |  |
| Message | "The proponents of this principle actually believe that thoughts create, control and manifest ALL EXTERNAL OBJECTIVE REALITY!" Only if you PERSONALLY decide to take it there. |
| Date | 2009-08-01 |
| Message | "Science reliable? Have you seen the recent news report where 1 in 7 scientists said they saw their colleagues FAKE data to please their funders?" Sheldrake and Radin have come clean then, eh?  |
| Date | 2009-08-01 |
| Location |  |
| Message | Appeal to ignorance. Ad hominem. Appeal to authority. That is all there is to WW's arguments. WW you're all hot air. |
| Date | 2009-07-30 |
| Message | Graham Priestly, First, the skeptico post about me has been closed. I can't respond to it anymore. The person behind skeptico is welcome to debate me on my forum. I already have many debates going on there. The winston wu site you brought up is nothing. It contains NOTHING legitimate against me. On the other hand, the author of it, Stefan Muth, has a long list of nasty crimes and people who hate him. Just google his name and you will see. There's a mountain of evidence against him and his character, from five sources. On the other hand, I never wronged him and in the past two years, he has not been able to cite even one thing I did wrong to him. |
| Date | 2009-07-29 |
| Message | Vinstonas, it seems that you are famous. I recently found a website dedicated to you. A pity that you don't allow direct links in the guestbook. What have you got to be scared of? This perhaps? .winston-wu.com/  |
| Date | 2009-07-27 |
| Location | |
| Message | Ironically the more faith we have the more we have to deny empirically tested reality. I've had arguments with woo believers that called themselves "skeptics" and labelled critical rational folks "pseudo" skeptics. These wild eyed credophiles used argument from authority or from popularity, and relied on stories unsubstantiated by physical evidence. When challenged they were like little children whose teddy bear had been taken from them, screaming and crying "pseudo skeptic!" |
| Date | 2009-07-27 |
| Location | |
| Message | Ironically, the more scientific knowledge we gain, the more we must acknowledge other realms of existence. Thank you for your contributions. I too have tried to converse with the pseudo-skeptics. When I backed them into a corner, they (like frightened children) resorted to name calling. It was like being at a Star-Trek convention. |
| Date | 2009-07-26 |
| Message | Oh dear. This site is seriously bad. Not much critical thinking going on here. Not much thinking of any kind for that matter. |
Page 17 of 19 << First < 14 15 16 17 18 19 >